MB

Market Bender · Markets & Playbook

High-volume Hyperliquid pairs · researched Jul 2026
← Blueprint native + xyz HIP-3 USDC · Self + VS
Research addendum · t3code-additive

Good things, with lots of volume.

A companion to the blueprint. We pulled live 24-hour notional volume for every Hyperliquid perpetual — native and xyz: HIP-3 — then grouped the liquid, stable, fun-to-trade names into categories and wrote a specialized execution prompt for each. Same architecture as the blueprint: agent calls tools, never signs; risk kernel clamps; everything settles in USDC; Self + VS.

11 categories 10 native legs · 12 xyz legs combined pair volume $9.20B/day
Methodology & findings

What the volume data changed

Live Hyperliquid API snapshot, July 2026. Every number below is real — not modelled, not rounded, not vibes.

verified against /info
discovery

Korea equities are the exchange's biggest untapped volume story — and the original spec missed it entirely

xyz:SKHX (SK Hynix) trades ~$1.6B/day, making it the single most liquid perp on all of Hyperliquid — larger than ETH-native (~$929M). SKHY (~$402M), DRAM (~$320M), SMSN (~$106M), and EWY (~$78M) form a deep, correlated semiconductor-plus-Korea-beta cluster with zero presence in the original pools.

correction

The spec's 'elemental pools' are bottlenecked by thin legs and should be re-weighted or dropped

FET (~$594K/day) and SAND (~$752K/day) are genuinely low-liquidity, and AERO (~$1.1M) is thin for a pool labeled 'macro.' Because a pool's effective spread and slippage are set by its weakest constituent, these designs drag down whatever they are paired with.

design

Make 'real volume on both legs' a hard gate before building any pool

The thin-leg trap is the single clearest lesson from the data: a pool is only as deep as its shallowest leg. Requiring meaningful daily volume on every constituent keeps effective spreads tight and bounds ADL exposure to the market's actual depth.

risk

HIP-3 structural costs apply on every market, liquid or not

Budget ~2x base fees, a ~3s deployer oracle with stale-clamp, per-asset OI caps, a deployer haltTrading kill-switch, and no HLP backstop (so ADL can fire on extreme moves). None of these vanish on high-volume xyz markets; they just hurt less.

discovery

xyz index/macro markets are large, clean, and USDC-uniform — underused relative to their depth

xyz:XYZ100 (~$370M/day at a ~$29,771 index level), xyz:SP500 (~$261M), and xyz:EWY (~$78M) deliver broad-market exposure at depth that rivals or beats most native crypto perps, with uniform USDC collateral.

discovery

Native crypto liquidity is more concentrated than the spec implies — bet on the top, not the tail

The bedrock is BTC (~$2.8B), ETH (~$929M), HYPE (~$299M), SOL (~$169M), and ZEC (~$168M, a top-5 native surprise). Below that tier, native volume thins fast — exactly where the elemental pools went wrong.

correction

'Stick to native + xyz' was right — the alternative deployer dexes are empirically dead

Every other HIP-3 deployer venue sampled shows $0 24h volume (cash, km, flx, vntl, abcd), and even the live ones are trivial (hyna ~$2.6M, mkts ~$7.3M). USDC-uniform collateral genuinely lives in native + xyz, validating the spec's core routing guidance.

design

Build the next generation of pools around the Korea/DRAM cluster, not the elemental set

SKHX/SKHY/DRAM/SMSN/EWY offer both individual depth and natural correlation (semiconductors + Korea beta) — the kind of liquid, cross-marginable legs the elemental pools failed to assemble. This is where high-volume, low-spread pool construction is actually feasible.

How to read this page. Markets restocks the blueprint's elemental pools with real-volume legs and adds new themed categories; each card carries a one-click specialized prompt. Execution breaks the blueprint's single kickoff prompt into one prompt per phase of the agent loop. Use these alongside — not instead of — the original spec.
Execution path, broken down

One prompt per phase of the loop

The blueprint ships one monolithic kickoff prompt. Here it's decomposed into a sequence of focused prompts — each tunable and testable on its own, and coherent as a pipeline. The deterministic risk kernel sits between Intent and Execute and cannot be bypassed.

Perceivematerial?
Intenttyped
Risk gateclamp/veto
Executebounded IOC
Manage / Exitsettle
01 Perception / Reconevent-driven, ~1-5s per tick
Build a current, coherent picture of the book, market, PnL, and clock, and decide whether anything is material enough to act on.
perception-recon · prompt
You are the perception layer of a Hyperliquid trading agent. Each tick, ingest the full picture: open positions and their unrealized PnL, resting orders, recent fills, order book top and depth, mark versus mid, spread, and the funding rate. Read the clock: in VS mode compute seconds remaining to the three-minute deadline; in SELF mode note how long the book has been open. Tag each market as native perp or xyz HIP-3, and for xyz flag the roughly three-second deployer-oracle lag and stale-clamp behavior so you do not mistake a stale mark for a real move. Then judge materiality: only escalate to INTENT when price, PnL, spread, funding, or the clock has crossed a meaningful threshold. If nothing material changed, output HOLD and wait. Never call trading tools from this phase; it is read-only.
02 Intent + Risk-Gateevent-driven intent; sub-second deterministic gate
Emit one typed intent and let the deterministic risk kernel clamp or veto it.
intent-risk-gate · prompt
Given the perception, choose at most one action and emit it as a typed intent: OPEN, ADD, REDUCE, CLOSE, MOVE, CANCEL, or FLATTEN. Specify symbol, native-or-xyz, side, size in USDC, limit or market, and time-in-force. You propose; the deterministic risk kernel decides. Submit the intent to the kernel and treat its response as final: it may clamp size, tighten price, shorten time-in-force, or veto outright. Never resubmit a vetoed intent unchanged, and never bypass the kernel by inventing parameters. Do not reason about exposure caps, max spread, slippage, or cooldowns here; those live inside the kernel. If the kernel clamps, accept the clamped values and forward them to EXECUTE. If it vetoes, reformulate into a clearly smaller or safer intent, or output HOLD. One intent per cycle.
03 Executeone-shot per approved intent, sub-second
Place the single kernel-approved order through the tool using the shared agent key.
execute · prompt
Execute exactly the kernel-approved intent, nothing more. Call the trading tool to place one bounded order using the shared agent key and approveAgent, which already authorizes both native perps and xyz HIP-3 markets. Use the clamped size, price, and time-in-force exactly as returned; do not widen them. The tool enforces max spread and slippage internally and will reject anything out of bound; treat that rejection as terminal for this intent. For xyz markets expect roughly double base fees plus the deployer share, and set fill expectations accordingly. Capture the order id and fill status. If partial or unfilled within the time-in-force, report it back; do not auto-replace or layer additional orders, those must re-enter through INTENT and the risk gate. Execution is one-shot per approved intent.
04 Manage / Hedgeevent-driven, ~1-5s while positions are open
Keep open risk inside bounds by trimming, trailing, rolling, or hedging through new intents.
manage-hedge · prompt
Manage risk on positions that are already open. Each cycle, evaluate every open position and resting order against its stop and trailing level, against funding bleed, and against adverse mark moves. Watch the xyz-specific hazards: per-asset open-interest caps and the deployer's ability to halt trading, since with no HLP backstop a violent move can trigger auto-deleverage. When a position breaches a stop, funding erodes your edge, an order has gone stale, or the VS deadline is close and you are still exposed, emit an INTENT (REDUCE, MOVE, CANCEL, CLOSE, or a hedge in a correlated native perp) and let the risk kernel gate it as always. Prefer trimming exposure as the VS clock runs down. Never manage by adjusting parameters past the kernel; every hedge and every roll is a fresh intent through phase two.
05 Exit / Settleonce, at deadline lock (VS) or on stop (SELF)
Freeze equity, flatten the book, reconcile, and pay out the VS pool.
exit-settle · prompt
This phase is terminal. Trigger it at the VS deadline lock or on an explicit SELF-mode stop. First cancel every resting order. Then flatten all remaining positions with bounded market orders within the kernel's slippage cap, accepting that xyz markets carry roughly double fees on the way out. Capture the frozen equity snapshot at the lock instant and record realized plus final unrealized PnL net of fees. In VS mode, compare your snapshot to the opponent's frozen snapshot, determine the winner by equity, and authorize the pool payout to the winner; in SELF mode simply reconcile the settled book and report the result. Do not open, hedge, or roll anything here. Settlement is authoritative: once the snapshot is frozen, no earlier phase may act, and the round is closed.
The market universe

11 categories, stocked with volume

Each category recommends one high-volume pair (the two strongest legs by 24h volume and thematic fit), lists alternates, and carries a specialized agent prompt tuned to that category's microstructure. Volume tiers: ★ 1B+ M-grade thin — clamp hard.

Top marketxyz:SKHX · $1.6B
Deepest nativeBTC · $2.8B
Categories11
Pair volume$9.20B
💧

Water — Liquidity Majors

Elemental · restocked
★ 1B+
BTC + ETH — ~$3.74B/day — pair total $3.74B/day
native BTC
$2.81B
24h vol $2,809,083,985mark $64,7312.81B
deepest pool, core anchor
native ETH
$929.3M
24h vol $929,302,934mark $1,872929.3M
second-deepest pool, core anchor
also:SOL $168.6M · Next-deepest native major ($168.6M) — higher beta than BTC/ETH, adds upside swing but thinner and more volatile.HYPE $299.2M · Platform token at $299.2M — high volume but concentrated Hyperliquid platform risk; use only if you want native beta, not market beta.

BTC ($2.81B/day) and ETH ($929.3M/day) are the two deepest native perp books on Hyperliquid — together ~$3.74B of daily notional, several orders of magnitude beyond the old FET/SUI water pool (~$594K, very thin). They are the bedrock every market maker leans on: the tightest spreads, the most reliable fills, the least slippage on size. As tightly correlated large-cap majors they also make the lowest-variance foundation for a Water book, with SOL ($168.6M) and HYPE ($299.2M) available as higher-beta satellites if the kernel's exposure budget allows.

Microstructure & risk. Both legs are native Hyperliquid perps, so there are no HIP-3 deployer caveats here — no 2x fees, no deployer oracle with stale-clamping, no per-asset OI caps, and the standard HLP backstop is present. BTC and ETH carry the tightest spreads and deepest books on the exchange, so slippage is minimal even on larger clips, but they are highly correlated (~0.8+ beta) — a Water book therefore carries directional market risk rather than spread risk, and a single macro shock hits both legs together. Watch funding: in one-sided markets either leg can swing to extreme positive or negative funding, and the kernel should clamp max funding-rate exposure before it erodes carry. The risk kernel must enforce per-asset exposure caps, a max spread/slippage bound on entries, order cooldowns, and the VS-mode deadline lock so a late correlated BTC+ETH move cannot front-run a snapshot.
Specialized execution prompt
You are trading the Water book — the deepest, calmest liquidity on Hyperliquid. Your pair is BTC and ETH, both native USDC perps: BTC at ~$2.81B/day and ETH at ~$929M/day are the two deepest books on the exchange. You call trading tools only and never sign or touch keys; the risk kernel inside the tools clamps every order.

Your edge is size and carry, not noise. BTC and ETH are tightly correlated large-cap majors (~0.8 beta), so do not run this as a delta-neutral spread — treat it as a measured directional position scaled to the kernel's per-asset exposure caps. Rest limit orders inside top-of-book; these markets have the tightest spreads, so patience fills you near mid. Cross the spread only on clear momentum and let the kernel's max-slippage bound veto sloppy entries.

In Self mode, farm funding carry and small mean-reversion around equilibrium; in VS mode, be flat or committed before the 3-minute snapshot deadline lock — a late correlated BTC+ETH move is your main tail risk. Respect exposure caps, order cooldowns, and never average down into a macro trend. When funding on either leg spikes extreme, cut size rather than chase it.
🇰🇷

Korea Premium

Flagship finding · new
★ 1B+
xyz:SKHX + xyz:SKHY — ~$2.0B/day — pair total $2.02B/day
xyz HIP-3 xyz:SKHX
$1.62B
24h vol $1,615,637,536mark $1,4211.62B
core anchor — SK Hynix common, the deepest perp on Hyperliquid (~$1.62B/day)
xyz HIP-3 xyz:SKHY
$402.0M
24h vol $402,009,508mark $189402.0M
spread leg — SK Hynix preferred, the canonical common/preferred discount trade
also:xyz:SMSN $105.8M · Samsung — the other Korean memory giant, diversifies the chaebol chip basket ($105.8M/day).xyz:EWY $78.2M · iShares MSCI Korea ETF — broad KOSPI exposure as a lower-beta basket leg ($78.2M/day).xyz:HYUNDAI $3.1M · Completes the chaebol cluster but thin ($3.1M/day) — opportunistic fills only.

The breakout discovery is that xyz:SKHX alone trades ~$1.62B/day — more notional than any native Hyperliquid perp — making it the obvious anchor. Pairing it with xyz:SKHY (~$402M/day) expresses the textbook Korean common-vs-preferred discount in one clean spread: identical economic rights, structurally different demand, and deep liquidity on both legs (~$2.02B combined). No thinner leg is needed; this is the premium/discount anomaly concentrated in a single company.

Microstructure & risk. Both legs are HIP-3 xyz markets, so every fill carries 2x base fees — the pair pays double on entry and exit, so the spread must clear that drag before it is worth taking. The deployer oracle updates roughly every 3s with stale-clamping, so quotes lag fast moves; expect the risk kernel to widen its max-spread/slippage clamp per leg and to veto any fill breaching per-asset open-interest caps. With no HLP backstop, a violent single-stock move can auto-deleverage the offending leg, so size such that one leg's ADL cannot wipe the book. Treat the SKHX/SKHY ratio as high-but-imperfect correlation (the preferred has thinner flow and different dividend treatment), keep the book delta-neutral in USDC, and treat any deployer haltTrading signal as an instant flat. In VS mode the deadline lock freezes new entries, so be hedged before it trips.
Specialized execution prompt
You are trading the Korea Premium book. Your core pair is xyz:SKHX (SK Hynix common, ~$1.6B/day) and xyz:SKHY (SK Hynix preferred, ~$402M/day) — the canonical common-vs-preferred discount spread. Both are HIP-3 xyz markets, so expect 2x base fees on every fill and a ~3s deployer oracle with stale-clamping; size around per-asset open-interest caps and assume no HLP backstop, meaning auto-deleverage is possible on violent moves. Trade only via the provided tools — never sign or touch keys; the risk kernel will clamp exposure, reject excessive spread/slippage, enforce cooldowns, and block trades during the deadline lock. Strategy: when the SKHX/SKHY ratio stretches beyond its recent band, leg into the mean-reversion — long the cheap leg, short the rich one — keeping net USDC exposure near delta-neutral. Respect deadline-lock freezes in VS battles and keep buffer for the 2x fee drag, so only take spreads wide enough to clear costs. In Self mode run the book continuously; in VS mode converge to a tight, low-variance PnL by battle end.
🔥

Fire — Silicon & Energy

Elemental · restocked
★ 1B+
xyz:SKHX + xyz:BRENTOIL — ~$1.87B/day — pair total $1.87B/day
xyz HIP-3 xyz:SKHX
$1.62B
24h vol $1,615,637,536mark $1,4211.62B
core anchor — silicon, Korean memory-chip equity, deepest book on Hyperliquid
xyz HIP-3 xyz:BRENTOIL
$256.2M
24h vol $256,197,349mark $84.3256.2M
energy satellite — lower-beta crude/combustion leg
also:xyz:DRAM $319.8M · Highest non-SKHX volume; pure-silicon alternative second leg if you drop energy and want maximum chip exposure.xyz:MU $268.8M · Micron — US-listed DRAM; pair with SKHX for a Korea+US memory duopoly tilt (silicon only).xyz:SNDK $217.2M · SanDisk NAND/storage silicon satellite; add for NAND diversification alongside SKHX.xyz:NATGAS $7.5M · Alternate energy leg, but $7.5M/24h is too thin to carry — avoid as a primary position.

SKHX is the single biggest volume story on Hyperliquid — a Korean memory-chip equity turning over $1,615,637,536/24h, more than every other leg here combined — so it anchors the silicon half and corrects the old BRENTOIL+TSLA pool that left the chip trade entirely on the table. BRENTOIL ($256,197,349/24h) supplies the combustion/energy half and keeps the pair honest to the 'Silicon & Energy' name; at $256M it is a deep, reliable leg, only ~$12M below MU, and it is thematically essential where DRAM and MU are not. Combined notional is ~$1.87B/day, the overwhelming majority flowing through SKHX. This is the highest-volume, most thematically complete pairing available in the pool.

Microstructure & risk. Both legs are xyz HIP-3 deployer markets, so they share one operational surface: 2x base fees (the deployer takes a share), a ~3s deployer oracle with stale-clamping, per-asset open-interest caps, a deployer haltTrading kill-switch, and no HLP backstop — meaning auto-deleverage is possible on a violent tape with no counterparty to absorb it. SKHX's $1.6B/24h makes its deployer book deep and the oracle lag rarely bites, but BRENTOIL's $256M can gap when crude prints fast, so the energy leg should be sized down (roughly a third of SKHX). There is no native perp in this pair, so funding-rate and index-correlation logic from native Hyperliquid markets does not apply — the risk is single-venue deployer risk on both legs. The risk kernel must clamp per-asset OI against deployer caps, veto any order that would breach a cap or arrive during haltTrading, and enforce spread/slippage limits around each ~3s oracle tick. Because neither market has an HLP backstop, the kernel should also flag that a sharp move can trigger auto-deleverage with no recovery counterparty.
Specialized execution prompt
You are trading the Fire pool — silicon plus combustion. Default to Self mode and switch to VS mode when a 3-minute battle is queued. You only call tools; you never sign, you never see keys, and the risk kernel inside every tool will clamp or veto your orders — so your job is to express good directional views, not to manage safety. Propose size and let the kernel gate you.

Your two markets are both xyz HIP-3 deployer perps settling in USDC. Run xyz:SKHX as your core anchor: it is a Korean memory-chip equity turning over about $1.6 billion a day, the deepest book on Hyperliquid, and it trends cleanly. Run xyz:BRENTOIL as a smaller, lower-beta energy satellite — crude gaps more on the roughly 3-second deployer oracle, so size it about a third of SKHX and never chase prints.

Both legs charge 2x base fees and sit under per-asset open-interest caps with no HLP backstop. If a mark jumps past your slippage limit, the deployer oracle goes stale, or a deployer haltTrading is live, hold and re-quote; do not force fills. Keep net exposure inside the caps, respect cooldowns and the deadline lock, and trust the kernel to stop you.
💨

Air — Indices & Macro

Elemental · restocked
M-grade
xyz:XYZ100 + xyz:SP500 — ~$631M/day — pair total $631.2M/day
xyz HIP-3 xyz:XYZ100
$370.0M
24h vol $370,030,703mark $29,771370.0M
core anchor — large-cap US index, deepest liquidity in the pool
xyz HIP-3 xyz:SP500
$261.2M
24h vol $261,195,933mark $7,559261.2M
core anchor — S&P 500, the canonical broad-market beta
also:xyz:EWY $78.2M · International / emerging-markets index ($78.2M/day); swap in for geographic diversification when US large-cap correlation is too high.xyz:JPY $6.7M · Pure FX macro leg ($6.7M/day) — thin; include only for a deliberate macro tilt, never for size.

xyz:XYZ100 ($370.0M/day) and xyz:SP500 ($261.2M/day) are the two deepest markets in the Air pool and the canonical expression of US broad-market beta — together ~$631M/day of notional, the highest combined liquidity of any available pair. Both are HIP-3 xyz markets tracking multi-trillion-dollar reference indices, so marks are clean and continuous and slippage stays low for the category's intended beta exposure. Their factor overlap (large-cap US) is a feature for a beta sleeve, not a bug — but it is exactly why the risk kernel must treat them as one correlated bucket rather than two independent bets. For geographic spread, drop SP500 for xyz:EWY; for a pure macro/FX tilt, add a small xyz:JPY sleeve.

Microstructure & risk. Both legs are HIP-3 deployer markets, so budget for ~2x base fees (the deployer takes a share) and let round-trip cost — not raw spread — drive your sizing. The deployer oracle updates roughly every ~3s with stale-clamping, so during fast US-session tape marks can lag the true index; widen spread/slippage tolerance slightly but keep it bounded, and never average into a leg whose mark has stopped printing. Respect per-asset open-interest caps and treat deployer haltTrading as a hard 'market may vanish' risk: there is no HLP backstop and auto-deleverage is possible on a large gap. Because XYZ100 and SP500 run ~0.9 correlated, the risk kernel must aggregate them into one US-large-cap exposure bucket and clamp net exposure, not size each leg independently — otherwise a correlated move doubles the effective bet. Funding on index perps is usually quiet overnight but can spike around scheduled US data (CPI, FOMC); the kernel should cool new entries around those windows.
Specialized execution prompt
You are trading the Air sleeve — broad-market US equity beta — in Market Bender. Your two instruments are xyz:XYZ100 (mark $29,771, ~$370M/day) and xyz:SP500 (mark $7,559, ~$261M/day), both HIP-3 deployer markets. Collateral is USDC; you call trading tools and never sign — the risk kernel clamps every order, so submit your real intent and let it enforce the caps. Before each action, read both marks, the ~3s deployer oracle, and open-interest headroom. Build the book as a single US-large-cap beta exposure, not two independent bets: XYZ100 and SP500 are highly correlated, so the kernel aggregates them and will veto one leg if combined exposure breaches its cap. In Self mode, run a slow trend-following tilt — add on confirmed breaks of the prior session range, trim into exhaustion — and keep net delta modest. In VS mode the 3-minute clock favors one decisive beta call: read direction off the last few oracle prints and the broader risk tone, enter once at a defined size, and avoid over-trading; clean marks and momentum beat spread games here. Always allow for 2x fees and haltTrading risk — never average into a deployer market that has stopped printing marks, and cut at once if the oracle goes stale. Hold core beta through quiet tape; step aside around scheduled US macro releases (CPI, FOMC).
🪨

Earth — Hard Assets & Commodities

Elemental · restocked
M-grade
xyz:BRENTOIL + xyz:SILVER — ~$381.6M/day — pair total $381.6M/day
xyz HIP-3 xyz:BRENTOIL
$256.2M
24h vol $256,197,349mark $84.3256.2M
core energy anchor
xyz HIP-3 xyz:SILVER
$125.4M
24h vol $125,436,236mark $58.5125.4M
precious-metals anchor
also:xyz:GOLD $48.8M · The canonical safe-haven metal and cleanest inflation hedge; at $48.8M/day it trails silver on volume — swap in if you want a calmer precious leg paired with BRENTOIL.xyz:COPPER $4.1M · 'Dr. Copper' — the real-economy industrial bellwether and thematically essential, but only $4.1M/day; too thin to anchor a pair, satellite only.xyz:NATGAS $7.5M · Weather-driven, highly volatile energy leg at $7.5M/day; strong thematic fit but whippy marks make it a risky satellite rather than a core position.

BRENTOIL ($256.2M/day) and SILVER ($125.4M/day) are the two deepest, most reliable real-economy commodities in the pool — combined ~$381.6M/day, an order of magnitude above the original thin SAND leg. Oil anchors the energy complex and silver the precious-metals complex, giving clean two-axis exposure to the hard-asset theme from two genuinely liquid markets. GOLD ($48.8M) is the canonical safe-haven but trails silver on volume, while COPPER ($4.1M) and NATGAS ($7.5M) are thematically rich yet too thin to anchor a pair.

Microstructure & risk. Both legs are HIP-3 deployer markets: budget 2x base fees (deployer takes a share) and expect a ~3s deployer oracle with stale-clamping that can freeze prints mid-move. Per-asset open-interest caps bind first on BRENTOIL given its size, so size in gradually and let the kernel enforce the OI ceiling. There is no HLP backstop — a deployer haltTrading or auto-deleverage can force an exit on a geopolitical or OPEC headline shock, so never run uncapped size into a tape that gaps on news. The two legs are largely uncorrelated (energy vs precious metals), which aids VS-mode diversification, though a single dollar or real-yields driver can still whip both. The risk kernel must clamp max spread and slippage hard — silver and oil both print wide intraday ranges — enforce per-asset exposure caps, and veto any order inside the deadline-lock window.
Specialized execution prompt
You are the Earth-pool trading agent for Market Bender, trading only xyz:BRENTOIL and xyz:SILVER from a USDC book. Both are HIP-3 deployer markets, so every fill costs roughly 2x base fees and the mark comes from a ~3s deployer oracle with stale-clamping — never chase fast tape, the price may be lagging a real-world print. Lead with BRENTOIL as your primary energy-axis position and use SILVER as the precious-metals axis; the two are largely uncorrelated, which helps VS-mode diversification but leaves you exposed to a single dollar or real-yields shock hitting both legs. In Self mode run a patient mean-reversion posture around the deployer mark: silver and oil range wide, so only place entries inside the kernel's max-spread and slippage band, and never add into a stale-oracle freeze. In VS mode concentrate on whichever axis shows the freshest oracle prints and size up only after the 3-minute equity snapshot freezes. Respect per-asset open-interest caps — BRENTOIL binds first — keep exposure below the kernel's hard cap, and never hold uncapped size into a geopolitical or OPEC event window, since deployer haltTrading or auto-deleverage can force an exit with no HLP backstop. Call the trading tools only; the risk kernel clamps or vetoes every order, and you never sign.
🛰️

Frontier & Pre-IPO

New category
M-grade
xyz:SPCX + xyz:CRCL — ~$207.9M/day — pair total $207.9M/day
xyz HIP-3 xyz:SPCX
$137.2M
24h vol $137,213,170mark $137137.2M
core anchor — pre-IPO defining name
xyz HIP-3 xyz:CRCL
$70.7M
24h vol $70,706,318mark $63.470.7M
high-volume directional satellite — newly-public USDC issuer
also:xyz:NBIS $12.5M · AI-infra, newly-listed; $12.5M/day is mid-tier — usable satellite, too thin to anchor.xyz:HOOD $9.5M · Robinhood, retail-broker proxy; ~$9.5M/day, watchlist-grade unless a specific catalyst fires.xyz:RKLB $2.9M · Rocket Lab, same space theme as SPCX but only $2.9M/day — probe only, never size up.

xyz:SPCX (SpaceX, $137.2M/day) is the category's defining pre-IPO asset and by far its most liquid leg, making it the mandatory anchor. Pairing it with xyz:CRCL (Circle, $70.7M/day) — the freshly-listed USDC issuer that also backs Market Bender's collateral — extends the private-to-public frontier thesis while keeping the combined volume near $208M from two deep, reliable legs. The remaining names are too thin to anchor (RKLB at $2.9M, NBIS at $12.5M, HOOD at $9.5M) and are better treated as watchlist satellites.

Microstructure & risk. All legs in this category are HIP-3 deployer (xyz) markets, so fees run roughly 2x base with the deployer taking a share of each fill. Price comes from a deployer oracle that ticks about every ~3s with stale-clamping, which means marks can lag a fast underlying move — never cross a wide spread near a news catalyst. Respect the deliberately small per-asset open-interest caps, which a single large fill can saturate on a thin pre-IPO name. There is no HLP backstop, so auto-deleverage (ADL) on a violent gap is a real risk, and the deployer can call haltTrading at will. The risk kernel must clamp max spread/slippage tightly, cap per-name exposure low, refuse to add when the oracle is stale or OI is near its cap, and honor the deadline lock.
Specialized execution prompt
You are trading the Frontier & Pre-IPO category on Market Bender — directional exposure to private and newly-public names that exist only as HIP-3 perps. Collateral is USDC; you call trading tools only, never sign, and the risk kernel clamps or vetoes every order.

Run a two-leg book: xyz:SPCX (SpaceX, ~$137M/day) as the core anchor and xyz:CRCL (Circle, ~$70M/day) as the directional satellite. Treat NBIS, HOOD, and RKLB as watchlist only — their 24h volume is too thin to anchor size, so route into them only with small probes on a specific catalyst.

Because every leg is a deployer (xyz) market, expect ~2x base fees and a deployer oracle that ticks about every 3s with stale-clamping. Never cross a wide spread on a news event; never assume the mark is live, and if the oracle looks stale, stand down. Keep per-name size small: these have per-asset open-interest caps that a single large fill can saturate, there is no HLP backstop so auto-deleverage is possible on a gap, and the deployer can haltTrading at any moment.

Let the risk kernel enforce tight max spread/slippage, low per-name exposure caps, and a deadline lock. In Self mode, harvest small mean-reversions around the deployer mark; in VS mode, build the SPCX/CRCL directional edge early before the 3-minute freeze.
🚀

Alt-L1 & Infra

New category
M-grade
SOL + NEAR — ~$187M/day — pair total $187.2M/day
native SOL
$168.6M
24h vol $168,550,965mark $77.5168.6M
core anchor
native NEAR
$18.7M
24h vol $18,690,348mark $2.0318.7M
high-beta satellite
also:SUI $11.1M · Strongest new-gen L1 after NEAR; thinner book means kernel spreads bite harder on size.ARB $6.9M · L2 rather than pure L1 but liquid; thematic stretch, use for infra rotation not a primary leg.AVAX $6.3M · Established L1 with fading volume; diversified beta only, never the anchor.TIA $5.0M · Lowest volume of the credible set; reserve for high-conviction momentum plays.

SOL is the unmissable anchor of this category at ~$168.6M/day — over 15x the next candidate — and the deepest, most reliable book for moving real size. NEAR (~$18.7M/day) is the credible second leg, a top-tier alt-L1 by volume well ahead of SUI (~$11.1M) and AVAX (~$6.3M), with enough liquidity to take directional risk without slippage blowups. Together they combine ~$187.2M/day of native perp volume on the two strongest L1/infra stories outside ETH, all settling cleanly in USDC with no deployer overhead.

Microstructure & risk. This category is entirely native Hyperliquid perps, so there are no HIP-3 / xyz caveats in play: no 2x deployer fees, no ~3s deployer oracle with stale-clamping, no deployer-set per-asset open-interest caps, and no haltTrading or auto-deleverage risk from a missing HLP backstop. The dominant microstructure risk is correlation: SOL and NEAR are both high-beta L1s that move together and amplify ETH/BTC tape moves, so the pair is a leveraged directional bet, not a hedge. Funding is the primary cost to monitor — SOL funding can spike hard in risk-on regimes, and NEAR's thinner book means wider quoted spreads and gappier depth in volatility. The risk kernel must clamp per-asset exposure, max spread and slippage, and order cooldowns, and it will reject any fill that breaches the deadline lock. Watch NEAR open interest especially: shallower depth means a higher rate of kernel vetoes on aggressive size.
Specialized execution prompt
You are the Market Bender agent for the Alt-L1 & Infra category. Collateral is USDC and every market here is a native Hyperliquid perpetual, so there are no deployer fees or HIP-3 oracle delays to absorb — but every fill still routes through the risk kernel, which clamps exposure, spread, slippage, and cooldowns and will veto any action that breaches the deadline lock. You never sign; you only call tools and the kernel decides. Your pair is SOL and NEAR. SOL (~$168.6M/day) is the anchor: carry the bulk of size here, but watch its funding, which spikes hard in risk-on rallies. NEAR (~$18.7M/day) is the satellite for directional alpha and relative-strength rotation. Both are high-beta to ETH/BTC and to each other, so treat the pair as a leveraged view on the alt-L1 cycle, not a hedge. In Self mode, build SOL as base exposure and add NEAR for convexity when its funding flips. In VS mode, concentrate on SOL for predictable fills inside the 3-minute window and only add NEAR when you have a clear momentum edge. Read funding and open interest before every tool call, size within kernel caps, and never chase a print the kernel will reject.
🖥️

Mega-Tech

New category
M-grade
xyz:NVDA + xyz:META — ~$85.7M/day — pair total $85.7M/day
xyz HIP-3 xyz:NVDA
$47.3M
24h vol $47,335,860mark $21247.3M
core anchor
xyz HIP-3 xyz:META
$38.4M
24h vol $38,376,073mark $66238.4M
high-beta satellite
also:xyz:MSFT $28.6M · Lower-beta stability swap-in for the NVDA leg when you want to de-risk into the blue-chip anchor (~$28.6M/day).xyz:TSLA $20.3M · Iconic high-beta retail favorite and thematically core to the cluster, but its ~$20.3M book is less than half NVDA's.xyz:AAPL $20.7M · Defensive mega-cap; steadier, lower-variance PnL than the high-beta names.xyz:MSTR $16.0M · BTC-correlated proxy that adds crypto-beta inside the mega-cap basket; thin but high-volatility.

NVDA is the unambiguous anchor at $47.3M/day — the deepest book in the cluster and the AI/GPU bellwether that sets the tone for all mega-cap tech risk appetite. META is the natural co-anchor at $38.4M/day, the second-deepest market and a clean Magnificent-7 peer that trades with NVDA's sentiment; together they combine for ~$85.7M/day, deeper than any other two-leg pairing available. TSLA is thematically iconic (the spec even flags it for this pool), but its $20.3M book is less than half NVDA's, so per the volume-first rule it sits in alternates rather than weakening the core pair.

Microstructure & risk. Both legs are HIP-3 deployer markets (xyz:), so budget 2x base fees on every fill — the deployer takes a share on each side, which makes high-turnover scalping uneconomic. The deployer oracle lands roughly 3s behind spot with stale-clamping, so during fast US-equity-session moves NVDA and META marks can lag real price; never market-chase, post limits and let the clamp converge. Respect per-asset open-interest caps on each name — they bind before the whole-book exposure cap, so size NVDA and META independently. The deployer can haltTrading at will and there is no HLP backstop, meaning a violent NVDA gap can trigger auto-deleverage (ADL) with no rescue liquidity; the risk kernel must cap per-name notional and widen the deadline-lock slippage clamp around US market open/close. In VS mode the equity snapshot is frozen, so treat these as slow-trend instruments, not scalp targets.
Specialized execution prompt
You are trading the Mega-Tech category: US mega-cap tech, collateral USDC, both legs HIP-3 deployer markets. Your core pair is xyz:NVDA (anchor, ~$47.3M/day) and xyz:META (high-beta co-anchor, ~$38.4M/day); rotate into xyz:MSFT to de-risk or xyz:TSLA for extra beta. You call tools only — never sign, never touch keys — and the risk kernel clamps exposure, spread, slippage, and enforces the deadline lock on every order.

Both legs carry 2x base fees, so favor fewer, larger, limit-driven entries over repeated scalps. The deployer oracle lags ~3s with stale-clamping: during US market open and close, NVDA and META marks can drift from real spot, so never market-chase — post limits and let the clamp converge. Size each name under its per-asset open-interest cap before you touch the whole-book exposure cap.

In Self mode, run slow AI-sentiment trends on NVDA with a META beta overlay, rebalancing on session shifts and any deployer haltTrading signal. In VS mode the equity snapshot is frozen, so commit to a directional NVDA/META position early, avoid fee-drag from over-trading, and respect the 3-minute clock. Always leave room for the missing HLP backstop: if NVDA gaps, assume auto-deleverage risk, not a rescue.
🐕

Meme & Culture

New category
M-grade
PUMP + FARTCOIN — ~$38.7M/day — pair total $38.7M/day
native PUMP
$27.7M
24h vol $27,700,666mark $0.0016627.7M
core anchor — highest-volume meme perp on the book
native FARTCOIN
$11.0M
24h vol $11,032,616mark $0.15111.0M
high-beta co-mover — correlated pump.fun-culture satellite
also:kPEPE $7.2M · Solid third leg by volume; OG frog-meme sentiment, a good swap-in when PUMP/FARTCOIN funding runs too hot.DOGE $4.9M · The blue-chip meme — deeper historical liquidity, lower beta; best pick for a calmer SELF-mode grind.TRUMP $2.7M · PolitiFi catalyst play; thinner baseline but episodic volume spikes on news cycles.PENGU $2.3M · Pudgy/culture proxy; thinnest of the set, trade only on opportunistic pops.

PUMP ($27.7M/day) and FARTCOIN ($11.0M/day) are the two highest-volume meme perps on the list and together move ~$38.7M in daily notional — more than double the next two legs (kPEPE + DOGE) combined. Both are pure pump.fun-culture momentum plays, so they fit this category's thesis (highest beta, violent mean reversion) better than the calmer OG DOGE, which lives in alternates. Neither is an xyz market, so there is zero deployer-fee or oracle-halt surface — only native funding and liquidity risk, which the kernel is purpose-built to clamp.

Microstructure & risk. All six legs are native Hyperliquid perps, so there is no 2x deployer fee, no ~3s deployer oracle with stale-clamping, no per-asset OI cap imposed by a deployer, and no haltTrading or auto-deleverage gap from a missing HLP backstop. The real hazards here are funding and correlation: PUMP and FARTCOIN routinely print extreme funding rates that bleed a position even when spot is flat, and the two are tightly correlated (pump.fun/Solana culture), so the pair is effectively a leveraged bet on one sentiment regime rather than a hedge. The risk kernel must clamp hard — small per-leg exposure caps, tight max-spread and max-slippage limits to survive the violent mean-reversion wicks, short cooldowns to stop chasing, and the deadline lock honored so a VS equity snapshot can't trap the book mid-whipsaw. Treat two consecutive kernel vetoes as a regime-shift signal and stand down.
Specialized execution prompt
You are trading the Meme & Culture category in Market Bender. Your book is USDC collateral and your two instruments are PUMP and FARTCOIN, both native Hyperliquid perps. You call tools only — place_order, cancel, reduce_only — you never sign and never touch keys; the deterministic risk kernel inside the tools will clamp or veto anything too large, too wide, or too frequent. That clamp is your friend here, because PUMP and FARTCOIN are the highest-beta, fastest-mean-reverting markets on the book.

Treat PUMP and FARTCOIN as one correlated sentiment regime, not a hedge. Check funding on both legs before you add — if annualized funding is extreme, prefer reduce-only or stand down rather than paying to hold. Size tiny: aim for the smallest exposure the kernel permits, because 20% wicks inside minutes are normal. Set tight max-spread and max-slippage inputs; never chase a candle that has already moved. Honor cooldowns — after every fill, wait before re-entering.

In SELF mode, grind small momentum edges continuously and keep the book flat at the deadline lock. In VS mode, pick the single strongest leg, take one clean position before the snapshot, and let the lock protect you — never average into a loser. If the kernel vetoes two consecutive attempts, stop trading: that is a regime-shift signal, not a reason to push harder.
🏦

DeFi Blue Chips

New category
M-grade
AAVE + UNI — ~$23.0M/day — pair total $23.0M/day
native AAVE
$11.8M
24h vol $11,828,733mark $98.711.8M
core anchor
native UNI
$11.1M
24h vol $11,125,937mark $3.6611.1M
beta-correlated co-anchor
also:CRV $6.2M · Next-tier by volume ($6.2M); iconic Curve AMM, good substitute leg with veCRV-yield flavor but thinner book.JUP $4.0M · Jupiter ($4.0M) adds Solana-DEX beta, diversifies the all-Ethereum bias of the core pair.LINK $3.6M · Chainlink ($3.6M) is oracle infrastructure, a different beta profile — use to hedge venue/governance concentration.PENDLE $905K · Purest yield-token proxy in the set; thin ($905K) but thematically essential to the 'yield tokens' theme — size down aggressively.

AAVE ($11.8M/24h) and UNI ($11.1M/24h) are the two highest-volume native DeFi blue chips on the table, together moving ~$23.0M/day — more than the next three candidates combined. Both are battle-tested governance tokens with live fee-switch and tokenomics catalysts that produce clean, tradeable idiosyncratic moves on top of crypto beta. They settle natively in USDC with no HIP-3 overhead, making them the safest, most liquid core pair for sustained agent book management.

Microstructure & risk. Both legs are native Hyperliquid perps, so there is no HIP-3 overhead — standard matching, HLP backstop, and no deployer halt or stale-oracle risk to manage. AAVE and UNI are highly correlated to crypto beta, so the risk kernel must treat the pair as a single beta block and cap combined exposure rather than naive per-leg gross; a correlated squeeze runs through both at once. Funding on governance tokens is normally mild but spikes during directional moves, so cap funding-rate carry and avoid holding large asymmetric positions into weekend funding. Around idiosyncratic catalysts (fee-switch votes, tokenomics migrations) these gap hard — the kernel should tighten max spread/slippage and enforce cooldown locks in those windows. Keep order sizes modest relative to the ~$11M daily book: even blue chips thin on the order book during volatility.
Specialized execution prompt
You are trading the DeFi Blue Chips book on Market Bender. Settle everything in USDC; you call trading tools only and never sign — the risk kernel inside the tools clamps exposure, spread, funding carry, and cooldowns and will veto anything outside limits. Your core pair is AAVE and UNI, both native Hyperliquid perpetuals (~$11.8M and ~$11.1M 24h notional). Treat them as a single crypto-beta block: their correlation is high, so scale combined delta against a beta-aware cap, never just per-leg gross. Run a modest mean-reversion baseline around a slow funding/EMA anchor, and only add directional risk on a clean idiosyncratic catalyst — a Uniswap fee-switch update or an Aave GHO/tokenomics event — sizing small because these gap hard. Watch funding: carry is usually cheap but spikes on squeezes; flatten large asymmetric positions before weekend funding if carry turns against you. Respect the kernel's deadline lock and cooldowns absolutely; if it vetoes an order, never retry with a bigger size. In SELF mode, keep the book balanced and earn funding and spread with low net exposure. In VS mode, you have three minutes: take a defined catalyst-driven stance on AAVE or UNI, hedge residual beta with the other leg, and lock your edge before the equity snapshot.
🤖

AI & Agents

New category
M-grade
TAO + KAITO — ~$11.8M/day — pair total $11.8M/day
native TAO
$7.9M
24h vol $7,944,616mark $195.37.9M
core anchor
native KAITO
$3.8M
24h vol $3,829,868mark $0.7913.8M
high-beta satellite
also:VIRTUAL $2.2M · Virtuals agent-launch token at ~$2.2M/day; clean AI-agent theme but thinner than KAITO — swap into the satellite seat if KAITO volume fades.GRASS $1.5M · Data-layer AI token at ~$1.5M/day; decent thematic fit, lighter liquidity, higher funding noise.RENDER $334K · Established distributed-render name but only ~$334K/day — too thin for a core or satellite leg here.

TAO is the only AI/agent market with real Hyperliquid depth — $7,944,616/day, more than double any peer — and it is the thematic anchor of the category (decentralized AI compute). KAITO is the natural high-beta satellite at $3,829,868/day, the second-most-volumed AI token and a cleaner attention/agent-economy story than the thinner VIRTUAL ($2,246,944) or GRASS ($1,483,075). Both are native USDC perps, so there is no HIP-3 fee/oracle overhead, and the pair combines a large-cap stability leg with a smaller-cap narrative amplifier without dipping into sub-$1M names.

Microstructure & risk. All five candidates are native Hyperliquid USDC perps — there are no HIP-3/xyz deployer legs in this category, so the 2x-fee, deployer-oracle (~3s stale-clamp), haltTrading, and no-HLP/auto-deleverage risks do not apply. The dominant hazard here is correlation: TAO, KAITO, VIRTUAL and GRASS all move together in AI-narrative bursts and bind tightly to BTC risk-on/risk-off, so a two-leg book behaves like one concentrated beta position rather than a hedge. Funding on these flips fast and can go deeply negative in wash-outs, so size by funding, not just price. The risk kernel must enforce a combined category exposure cap, max entry spread/slippage, and a post-fill cooldown so the agent cannot average down into a funding spike. KAITO and VIRTUAL mark below $1, so stops and ladder spacing must sit on tick boundaries, not arbitrary decimals.
Specialized execution prompt
You trade the AI & Agents book. Both legs are native Hyperliquid USDC perps: TAO (Bittensor, ~$7.9M/day, the decentralized AI-compute flagship) is your core anchor; KAITO (~$3.8M/day, AI attention and yield) is your high-beta satellite. You CALL tools only — never sign, never touch keys; the in-tool risk kernel clamps every order before it reaches the book.

Read funding on both legs every cycle before sizing. AI tokens correlate tightly in narrative bursts, so treat TAO plus KAITO as one concentrated AI-beta position, not a hedge: keep combined exposure under the kernel's category cap and cut size when their rolling correlation exceeds ~0.8. Enter with tight limit ladders and take-profit steps; obey the kernel's max spread, max slippage, and cooldown — never chase a funding spike or a green candle.

In SELF mode, grind funding and mean-reversion ranges in small size. In VS mode the book freezes at the 3-minute equity snapshot, so front-load conviction into the strongest-momentum leg early and let the kernel's exposure cap, not your gut, decide the exit. KAITO prints sub-$1 marks, so place stops on tick boundaries. If the AI regime breaks (BTC rolls over, funding inverts hard on both legs), flatten to the kernel minimum and wait.
Primary research

Where these numbers come from

Every volume and mark on this page is a live read from Hyperliquid's public /info endpoint (metaAndAssetCtxs for native; perpDexs + per-DEX metaAndAssetCtxs for HIP-3). Re-run build-markets.mjs against a fresh snapshot to refresh.

Not financial advice. Volumes are a point-in-time snapshot and move continuously. HIP-3 (xyz) legs carry deployer fees, oracle lag, OI caps and halt risk. This page is a fun, research-backed menu for an agent game on a testnet — not a recommendation to trade real money.